Friday, February 24, 2006
Incomprehensible
[Opponents of the bill argued that abortion should at least be allowed in cases involving rape, incest and a threat to a women's health.
If a woman who is raped becomes pregnant, the rapist would have the same rights to the child as the mother, said Krista Heeren-Graber, executive director of the South Dakota Network Against Family Violence and Sexual Assault.]
Wow. Wow. Wow.
Read or Post a Comment
This bill is so wrong on so many (all) levels. I can't comprehend it either.
Roe needs to be overturned. There is no constitutional right to abortion. It is simply not in there. And to pretend there is some sacred right when none exists is pure folly.
Leave it to the voters of the various states to decide the issue.
John